EatQOD

Eating (mostly) every other day

By posting here you are giving permission to reprint your comments in EatQOD publications.
Please read our disclaimer
It is currently Tue Sep 07, 2010 3:16 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 1 post ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Risk of prolonged dieting in terms of loss of bone density
PostPosted: Tue Dec 12, 2006 1:42 pm 
Offline
Site Admin

Joined: Fri Nov 26, 2004 11:27 am
Posts: 141
A new paper in December Archives of Internal Medicine by Fontana's group:

http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/conten ... 66/22/2502

Bone Mineral Density Response to Caloric Restriction–Induced Weight Loss or Exercise-Induced Weight Loss

A Randomized Controlled Trial

Dennis T. Villareal, MD; Luigi Fontana, MD, PhD; Edward P. Weiss, PhD; Susan B. Racette, PhD; Karen Steger-May, MA; Kenneth B. Schechtman, PhD; Samuel Klein, MD; John O. Holloszy, MD

Arch Intern Med. 2006;166:2502-2510.

Background Bone loss often accompanies weight loss induced by caloric restriction (CR), but whether bone loss accompanies similar weight loss induced by exercise (EX) is unknown. We tested the hypothesis that EX-induced weight loss is associated with less bone loss compared with CR-induced weight loss.

Methods Forty-eight adults (30 women; 18 men; mean ± SD age, 57 ± 3 years; and mean ± SD body mass index, 27 ± 2 kg/m2) were randomized to 1 of 3 groups for 1 year: CR group (n = 19), regular EX group (n = 19), or a healthy lifestyle (HL) control group (n = 10). Primary outcome measure was change in hip and spine bone mineral density (BMD). Secondary outcomes were bone markers and hormones.

Results Body weight decreased similarly in the CR and EX groups (10.7% ± 6.3% [–8.2 ± 4.8 kg] vs 8.4% ± 6.3% [–6.7 ± 5.6 kg]; P = .21), whereas weight did not change in the HL group (–1.2% ± 2.5% [–0.9 ± 2.0 kg]). Compared with the HL group, the CR group had decreases in BMD at the total hip (–2.2% ± 3.1% vs 1.2% ± 2.1%; P = .02) and intertrochanter (–2.1% ± 3.4% vs 1.7 ± 2.8%; P = .03). The CR group had a decrease in spine BMD (–2.2% ± 3.3%; P = .009). Despite weight loss, the EX group did not demonstrate a decrease in BMD at any site. Body weight changes correlated with BMD changes in the CR (R = 0.61; P = .007) but not in the EX group. Bone turnover increased in both CR and EX groups.

Conclusions CR-induced weight loss, but not EX-induced weight loss, is associated with reductions in BMD at clinically important sites of fracture. These data suggest that EX should be an important component of a weight loss program to offset adverse effects of CR on bone.

------------------------------------
Comment: Again, this is why we emphasize that the QOD diet is NOT a lifestyle diet until more is known about the long terms risks vs. benefits of caloric restriction. It is a short-term weight loss diet.

Also, the daily requirements for calcium, magnesium, as well as vitamin D should be scrupulously followed, and exercise is an important component of the QOD diet plan.

However, it should be pointed out that the people in this study were eating an average of 1700 cal/day, and had adequate intakes of vitamin D, calcium and magnesium as monitored by a dietitian. So taking supplements including vitamin D while dieting would not protect someone from this bone loss if this study is correct, and exercise is a must.

JT


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 1 post ] 

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group